The amount of time the UI/UX for cosmetic related things have been updated is staggering compared to the lack of actual UI QOL overhauls the game needs and has been needing since release.
Never change Fatshark.
15 Likes
heuā¦ this is not really hard to design such imageā¦
2 Likes
isnāt the launcher actually a webpage. not that I donāt approve of pearl clutching.
8 Likes
Most likely. Iām just annoyed by it being actually done tbh
You still canāt see your teammates ammo count or their health/toughness 
(without mods)
2 Likes
screw that, you cant see your dodge count at all unless you use mods.
Just use NumericUI
1 Like
im glad i got a pc then instead of a console, too bad itās an amd machine and i get sub 60 on A 7900XT!@?!?!??!?@?!?!?!?!?! WHAT THE KARK?
1 Like
Honest answer from an AMD user for more than 20 years.
AMD is always, on paper, the best.
In tests, their cards are always just behind.
In realityā¦ you always get bugs that hit only AMD users.
I switched to intel when the bandwagon switched to AMD. I really hope that intel will get better, because I see a real difference between all my AMD computers in 20 years and the 2 I made with an intel CPU. I have even changed my wifeās computer to an intel. I upgraded her ryzen 5 3600 to an ultra core 245k.
(edit: removed the word āand CPUāā¦ because what I wrote was with the performance before the ryzen era ā actually this is incorrect ā their CPU have best benchmarks.)
i think UX devs in general work too much when they dont have to and too little when they actually have to fix something
Their CPUs are the best. I wouldnāt use some Benchmark Websides because UserBenchmark for example is known to intentionally portray AMD as worse.
Their GPUs are great too, not on Nvidia Level but not that much of an gap and recently Nvidia has had constant issues with Drivers especially for older GPUs their newest Drivers make the Game crash on a lot of their Models.
A lot of issues with AMD Cards comes more from some Games, like Darktide for example, not optimized it for them but they run just fine with Linux. Only issue when you play on Windows.
1 Like
For me, benchmarks are not the only thing to consider. Iāve used Asus motherboards and AMD CPUs for more than 20 years. I bought them when they were not the best,
and also when they reached the top.
What I can say, as I told you, is that with AMD, Iāve always experienced strange bugs that only affected AMD users.
Iām not even trying to convince you otherwiseā¦ I know the game industry relies on benchmarks, and that if one CPU scores 16 100 points and another scores 16 050, the latter is clearly considered a bad one.
This is just my opinion. I understand that you have a different one.
And about UserBenchmark, I know its reputation. I agree. However, benchmarks are not how I make my choices.
Personally, I play in 4K. The difference between an Intel CPU and an AMD one is less than 1% (my CPU never gets hot during games).
And honestly, my own experience has been best with Intel. To be honest, when I tried it, I thought I wouldnāt like it. And I loved it.
I really like Intelās move. My CPU now has temperatures that I consider normal, unlike the Raptor Lake family or AMD CPUs. What they did with this generation, Arrow Lake, is great! They made them run cooler, and thatās great.
Used Radeon when it was not AMDā¦ and my last great graphics card was a Vega 64 with liquid cooling, which I have just replaced in my wifeās computer with my old RTX 3080.
The Vega 64, when released, looked great on paper. In reality, it was a good card, but not as good as it was marketed by AMD.
I used Nvidia when they were just starting out. It was so buggy that I switched to Radeon (before they became AMD). When I tried the RTX 3080, it was pure luck. One morning I opened my favorite shop and saw a 3080 at a good price. I thought the card was good, but I had no idea that, at that price, I was about to buy a card for half the price it would cost for a long time.
This card has been a game changer. And my new 5080 is also great. However, I refused to go for the 5090 because of the melting connectors. You see, here I would like Nvidia to focus on safety, just like Intel corrected the excessively high temperatures of their CPUs.
Gotta pay the cosmetics department somehow.
More macrotransactions to feed the macrotransaction creation pipeline.
iād like a reworked launcher that allows us to buy stuff, not just to look at it and hope it will be available once in a blue moon.
wait, wasnāt the shop the only part working perfectly on release?
Always is, nowadays. Itās an industry trend.
No, the shop had issues like everything else.
You know what else is disgusting? They advertise darktide cosmetic **** on the vermintide 2 launcher.
1 Like
Maybe they should advertise VT2 cosmetics in Darktide launcher too.
Or lets forget the game entirely and let us purchase cosmetics through web browser then we donāt need to load the game at all.