This is why America doesn’t allow its workers to take 100+ vacation days a year off.
Nothing gets done and they’re actually lazy and prone to take lazy shortcuts
2 Likes
It’s Warhammer. The prettiest thing you can do is kill and die for the emperor.
But as a cosmetic guy myself, I understand. I don’t think they’ll change it, but good luck.
I would not be citing that place as an example of anything done right…
Treating workers like human beings is always the right answer.
8 Likes
Yah never should of entered WW1 or WW2
1 Like
idk, to me it always felt like baggy clothes or buff female characters which of course you’d be buff if you’d fight like hell.
maybe people dont like their female character being muscular? i know i do.
and i feel obliged to add that it does make sense to me to give unisex clothes and armor to rejects since.. well since they usually dont live long and you gotta pass the uniform to another reject afterwards.. feels right its not tailored for them
yeah… becasue that’s the root of their issues…
1 Like
But what if a reject identifies themselves as a “Cat”? 
The root of our issues is humanity…
But yah US entering WW1 lead to allies winning and harsher penalties to Axis that lead to WW2 and further military developement. Then US swooping up german scientist for massive military development. Only surviving manufacturing into US becoming world bank and producer… large reason for current US prosperity.
Including American work hours still acting like wartime and post standards to meet old quotas and now is just 24/7 service / instant gratification neediness…. Heavy breathing
1 Like
Wat?
2 Likes
It’s a bit of off topic, but there is something wrong with character models from the start. So no wonder they just don’t bothered by adjusting drips for male/female body.
Continuing the discussion from Fixing DT cosmetics in this thread:
2 Likes
I should correct it that female character shoulders should be sloping/narrow to look more feminine, it’s the common way used in media, and in DT it’s more like a broad (wich is fine if you want athletic bodytype).
Tho the problem is arms attached too low or something. I can’t help myself but for me eye there is something wrong with the models.
And so most sets will look weird.
2 Likes
Its not that. Theyre NOT muscular women.
Im all for badass muscular women but thats not what we got.
Theyre transvestites with top surgery because fatshark is too lazy to make a seperate skeleton for females because it would necessitate them to make 2 versions of armor in the cash shop and actually require them to be productive in the workplace and put in some hours developing their game instead of just patching it to a passable place years later.
L.A.Z.Y.
5 Likes
Nah I’m just weirded out a little at the mandatory top surgery. It’s mostly noticeable on psykers but it’s there for virtually every character.
3 Likes
chest binders
thank me later.
and, it makes no sense for boob armor to exist.
This is a hilariously reductive framing I’m not particularly surprised you went for.
Did I ask for ‘boob armor’? No. I just said it’s weird how every single skin basically invalidates body type because I guess rigging a slightly different model was too hard.
4 Likes
do you all understand the environment the 40K world exists in?? That whole ‘there is only war’ bit is not hyperbole; attempting to maintain body fat on a diet of reconstituted humans is probably not going to give you that summer body you’re all thirsting over…
it’s like expecting a generation raised by social media to have realistic expectations
2 Likes