I agree.
Nothing will come from the discussion.
Even the part of the community that complain about mods are not agree:
- about what Fatshark should do
- several agree about a clarification, maybe not all
- several want that mods are removed entirely
- several want something else but they never say what
- about the definition I have seen two definitions:
- the one about ESP mod that could involve lot of mods like NumericUI
- the one that point actions that an human cannot do… most of this is not related to mods but to macro and this is linked to animation cancel that should be fixed in game.
- all of them cannot list the mods they point. And I think that if they would, they would not agree about what to put in it (of course they would agree about several)
At the end, we cannot discuss. We have no real inputs from all these posts except that a part of the community wants to complain about how Fatshark handle mods. And finally, we have no solution proposed.
I profit of this post to point that I did a poll. I tried my best to put all options proposed. But, as always when I ask questions, when I tried to ask what was proposed, I never get a clear answer (as what happened here).
Nevertheless, the poll is NOT closed. You can even modify your vote. please voice your opinion, as a forum user, in it.
The actual result (for first question) is:
Feel free to voice your opinion, at least by voting in it. It takes 5 minutes.