The OP includes a bullet point list of complaints.
I asked a question about the reasoning for one of the complaints in the context of the scenario that the other complaints are already fixed.
Completely valid question. No misrepresentation or anything like that.
Thanks for the explanation.
Then you should not have made that claim in the first place.
I think the asking of several questions when you already have a valid suggestion (to not display names if the issues are fixed), causes unnecessary back-n-forth. Being direct and straight-to-the-point is more efficient. Also, apologies for my previous purposefully passive aggressive response to you.
It is more efficient for sure, but i was curious about your reasoning and your opinion.
You might have had several reasons for wanting to know the name of the kick instigator.
One person does not always see all angles. That is why many things are discussed.
3 players alive, one is lacking behind while you and another are standing further ahead,
vote kick gets initiated on the person lacking behind, obviously not because he did anything toxic,
hence you decline, person before you looks at you and makes movements & camera movements that suggest to you to move on,
you decide to wait for the slacking player still, but the other player decides to leave you and move forward and progress further.
so:
now one player is trying to kick another
either the dead player waiting for rescue
or the impatient living player,
they are potentially friends kicking another only so their dead friend can play again sooner.
to avoid this it not only would be necessary to know who initiated but also if another player “agreed to kick” already.