You didn’t fix old officer’s jacket and you released new one with the same problem
Why am I even bother at this point?
Why am I even bother at this point?
1 Like
you bought it, that tells fatshark youre ok with how things are.
21 Likes
Forgive my ignorance. What am I looking for? I can’t find the issue. 
4 Likes
Don’t worry, according to their latest open letter to community, “tHeY LIstEn tO yOur FeEdbaCk”.
Expect fix in few years.
1 Like
make better financial choices then FS will prolly fix it in 6 months so youll have to wait
4 Likes
“I have a problem with this cosmetic you didnt fix! I bought a reskin, somehow expecting you’d fixed this slightly differently colored version of this cosmetic, but somehow this exact copy of the previous cosmetic I bought is exactly like the previous cosmetic I bought! Whaaaaaat gives!”
6 Likes
there’s nothing wrong, did you confuse “doesn’t look how i want it” with an actual problem?
Changing something for purely cosmetic purposes is not okay in most cases. With the krieg greatcoat for example it was a cosmetic glitch as the chest pouch clipped through the arm. Both coats have no technical issue. Changing them after they have been advertised and purchased simply for “flavor’s sake” with no technical justification is skirting very close to fraud.
This came up with the gas masks a while back too. How some didnt have hoses and some people wanted them to patch in hoses but alot of people who bought them…purchased them because they liked the look without the hose.
Opinions are not universal across ANYTHING drastically changing something after it has been put up for purchase in costmetics with no technical justification ALWAYS causes huge backlash. If you dislike the cosmetic then do…not…purchase…it.
There is no way it will be changed after release to accomidate a fraction, however large of a fraction, of the community’s personal taste. People who bought it bought THAT VERSION and do not deserve to have the version they paid for taken from them.
Maybe by 2026 youll have your jacket fixed
Don’t give the dog a snack when it craps on the carpet.
1 Like
Ultimately the only solution is to cease buying cosmetics for female characters that don’t look right. Fatshark (or rather, Adia I guess, the Chinese art studio doing all of these) drops the ball on this a lot, making some pretty awful looking female cosmetics, and the only feedback mechanism is to not spend money.
Sales #'s are the ultimate form of feedback.
1 Like
No offense but this game has far larger issues than complaints about cosmetic details.
To clarify a few things:
- Haven’t bought a single cosmetic since the release of (not so)comissar’s skin. Doesn’t looks like fatshark cares.
- It is not just my opinion
is that- dude it’s not broken, it’s that there’s a hard flak vest under the jacket holding it like that. they don’t make them in “flattering ladie’s svelte” models. it’s a design choice.
1 Like
Agreed. But since those who buy cosmetics are paying extra premium on an already paid for game, I think it’s fair that they are looked after.
2 Likes
They should at the very least add gloves to the Commissar skin
Or it’s simply a poorly created cosmetic, which is what happens when you outsource to a low-cost company to save money rather than having your own art team work on them.
Here’s how it should have looked, fitting-wise:
Here’s a commissar cosplay by a guy who isn’t particularly lean to demonstrate that the Darktide coat is also too big on men. If you’ve ever worn a suit in real life, you’ll recognize the positioning of the shoulder pauldrons ingame as a dead giveaway:
3 Likes
They saw the “product” then they pressed the buy button. They accepted it as it is. The argument is moot anyway, as people who create / “fix” the cosmetics aren’t really responsible for fixing the actual issues. I see no issue with these cosmetics myself, so I assume someone has some pedantic expectations. Unless…they mean the character width, in which case this isn’t getting fixed. This affects many other cosmetics, even free ones.
1 Like
1: There is such a thing as return policy for most things. Even digital in many instances.
2: If a customer finds something wrong (objectively) with their purchase, it is in the best interest of the company to make the customer a happy and returning one.
3: My point wasn’t for this specific cosmetic, so just because you don’t see anything wrong with it, doesn’t apply to my argument. I even asked myself “what’s wrong with it?” earlier in the thread.
4: I can’t say with 100% certainty, but I’d assume that the people who make and fix cosmetics, are responsible for fixing issues with said cosmetics. That is, if there is an actual issue.
As such, I find YOUR “argument” to be moot. 
This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.