i thought the nerfs were unjustified, and the advantage survivalist gave you on the battlefield wasn’t sufficent to justify a nerf
What advantage? You just tried telling me ammo didn’t matter even without it. Now it matters again?
That would further incentivize Vets who rely on ranged weapons too much to use melee even less, which is something we definitely don’t need.
We need more Vets to use melee, even if they want to roleplay as a “sniper” that is deathly allergic to melee weapons.
no i’m telling you it never mattered, and therefore changing the aura was not justified
So what does it matter if it gets nerfed if you never need ammo without it anyway? Why was the nerf a mistake then?
because they nerfed something that didn’t need a nerf?
But according to you it wasn’t a nerf because it changed nothing, you already had full ammo all the time even without it so it makes no difference.
You’re going to have to pick between “the nerf wasn’t justified and shouldn’t have happened” and “the aura did nothing anyways”
they are not mutually exclusive, i don’t need to choose one
They are mutually exclusive. If ammo never mattered, then it doesn’t matter if survivalist gets nerfed. It won’t change anything because you never ran out of ammo anyway (according to you).
i’m saying the nerf was not justified, because the perk was overrated by the community, i didn’t open 300 topics to bich and moan about it when it happened
i just thought it was stupid, and i hate stupid
So if it doesn’t matter anyway and the aura does nothing, why do you specifcially oppose changes to it to make the vet aura selection more interesting, and why did you just say everyone should pick it over fire team?
because fire team does literally nothing my dude, i just told him to pick the better option
but then again if we speak normal games then fire team is better, no dobut
so now you’ve completely reversed positions and suddenly 5% damage is “literally nothing” while suddenly survivalist actually is better (despite you previously insisting it does literally nothing because you already swim in ammo)
Here is the clasiscal veteran behavior: minimize minimize minimize. It’s good? No it does nothing actually. But don’t nerf it! But it does nothing. But never change it please! But keep in mind it doesn’t do anything. Just never change it regardless. Yes you should always pick it. But it does nothing actually.
there he goes, profiling
I’ve always been a fan of profiling of all kinds
as i said but you ignored, i think fire team (literally nothing) is better than survivalist in normal games
Ralendill knows, ask him
Flip flop flip flop flip flop
it does nothing! but you should pick it!
yes because the other options are worse
and yes its a veteran behavior, cause veteran talents sucks
Downplay, minimize, etc
It’s really just dishonest behavior. Downplay and minimize Veteran’s benefits because you want to see him buffed. Here’s the thing: I don’t want any class buffed or nerfed, I want the classes balanced because the game’s more fun in the end that way. Playing favorites and arguing about it like it’s a political career is some caveman stuff
no i’m fine, even if they make veteran even more miserable than it is now, i’ll just gatekeep the class amongst many others that likes it for the flavor
still doesn’t mean i’ll keep shut when i see stupid happen
although to be fair i think the players that played veteran because they thought it was strong have already left the game since patch 13