It’s not about you. You don’t need ≠ others don’t.
Claiming it’s a subjective topic, and at the same time arguing only your perspective is right, when noone is asking to remove anything, but add.
Classic.
9 Likes
Yes, she is objectively attractive; use the [Freecam] mod and look at her ingame instead of the photos.
She looks like a battle-harded woman over the meth heads we players have ingame, unless you use the “cute dark skinned female face” or the female face that everyone else is using.
I don’t believe that everyone must be gorgeous, but it’s evident here that Fatshark jumped on the Sweet Baby Inc. wave, which has polluted the game industry for quite some time in terms of character design and narrative.
8 Likes
I don’t use mods but that’s fine, we can certainly all agree that we all want more options. I just hope it’s a broad range so then everyone is happy.
we’re rejects, not the emperors children.
You’re focusing to much on the word “reject”.
There are numerous reasons why someone could be branded a reject in 40k, such as saying something you shouldn’t, annoying a higher up or walk on the wrong side of the road/jaywalking.
Being a reject means that you did not fulfill your duty to the Imperium (only in death does duty end), not because you were under the influence of meth.
Like my character who fled from the battle at Big Toof River, where Colonel Al’ Ter-Ay’s forces were massacred. Cowardice.
2 Likes
Yeah fan art, because official GW art depicts people as ugly all the time! Let’s show some examples:
A former hooker until she joined an inquisitors retinue.
A female shock trooper after her planet was destroyed.
A female commissar after years of campaigning.
A female hive ganger.
All of these women have tough biographies comparable to our rejects - yet GW clearly depicts them as very attractive. So sorry -Lore just isn’t a valid argument why no additional attractive options should be made available.
Especially since our characters are not a representation of humanity as a whole but that part of humanity that is physically fit enough to prevail repeatedly in close quarter combat. Physical fitness is often accompanied by attractiveness.
All in universe and lore discussions aside: my wife dislikes she has no pretty options as she wants her avatars in game to be pretty. I don’t have the same problem as all cosmetics are male anyway and before I got my death Korps gasmask I still could hide half the face behind a beard!
Although I‘m very annoyed by the decisions that a) beard and eye brows are linked and b) you cannot assign different colors to your hair and your eye brows…
12 Likes
You’re absolutely right.
My links in my earlier post are all officially licensed warhammer art too. Not fanart. That’s just a way to try and ‘devalue and dismiss’ evidence to those who don’t bother clicking the links. It’s very common for the opposition undermine an argument by making it appear that we’re using a ‘false authority’ fallacy.
I honestly don’t understand why people are against it. It’s not like I’m asking for neon-colored sunshine and butterflies cosmetics.
Doesn’t matter I guess. My question has been answered. I’ll check back next year to see if anything changed.
Thanks for your time, everyone. I might disagree with some of you but I enjoyed reading your opinion regardless.
I hope you all will continue to enjoy Darktide!
10 Likes
Yeah, but what does it have to do with others? You don’t need to chose typically attractive face in character creation (that’s… what character creator is for?). You can choose one that you prefer. I don’t understand why your preference should stop others from having options that allign with their preferences.
Some poeple love to tell others what is the correct way of thinking… It’s only freedom of choice if all choices are the ones I like. Hypocrisy at best.
10 Likes
Just say you’re willing to buy a DLC for a different model for your human character and Fatshark will consider the idea if there’s enough people asking for it.
3 Likes
Yeah you’re right, labelling it as “fan” art was wrong of me. Point is, though, it’s art. And for the record I clicked many of the links 
Not against adding more choice tbh, I just respect the direction they’ve chosen.
That about sums up my thoughts on the matter 
2 Likes
tbf fatshark have never designed aesthetically pleasing characters, this is apparent in their otger tide game vermintide. even kerillian who is supposed to be beautiful looks rough and grizzled.
its likely a design choice to amplify the point that neither universes allow the luxury of living a life healthy enough that promotes pretty humans.
1 Like
How dare you?! She’s the most beautiful elf in all of Ubersreik!
1 Like
I wonder if it could be easy to at least swap the underlying body model of female player character with the model of Dukane with a mod, in the mean time.
Although this could probably lead to problems of cosmetic items and outfits meant for player models to get issues with a different body model 
Aside from the last one, are they not all the same woman? They’ve got some mad sameface going on.
Traditionally beautiful women, particularly as rejects, would fit the game aesthetic about as well as neon-coloured sunshine and butterflies cosmetics, IMO.
1 Like
Yeah Minka Lesk and Alizabeth Bequin could be sisters indeed ^^
My opinion then differs from yours in that regard 
4 Likes
Eisenfaust, posting how wrong he is as usual.
2 Likes
So… only ugly people can be criminals or rejects?
Ok.
5 Likes
Ignore them. They’re not interested in logic and reason. They only want to troll you, dont give them the satisfaction.
Since you’re the person I disagree with the most on these forums I take this as a welcome compliment.
Thanks! 
6 Likes