Did you not link the most popular posts (one and two, both of which have ~10x the discussion of the threads you posted) on the topic because they don’t fit your narrative that “everyone” has problems with the new tree (other than the universally-agreed upon length/point flexibility issue)?
Now that the knee-jerk reaction to the trees has settled down, many people (surely not all) agree that the keystones are strong and the tree just needs more interconnectivity/flexibility/tweaking.