Mods and how Fatshark should handle them, in your opinion (2)

Well, my whole point is that I don’t either and that nobody does. I just wish they would be direct when questioned. I get your reference to sanctioning in VT2, but it’s very different when all they have to say “No, this affects players, report people who use it” and then they’ll have a few cases of that in their tickets.

Like to begin with, a lot of the recurring theme of these threads is

this affects me!

nuh uh!

yeah huh!

But why can’t Fatshark just not say if it’s an acceptable level of impact or not? Why does the community have to go with, you have to admit, slightly nebulous TOS? It states

But as we just had our exchange, it became clear that neither of us actually know for sure if Always First Attack falls under that or not. They need to be more clear on these things, both for the benefit of people who feel bothered by mods they perceive as cheaty, AND players who want to use those mods.
As that’s a bit of an outdated example you could obviously apply this entire argument to anything similar that’s up right now (such as the staff light attack spam macro, which is still on the nexus as of right now - does that mean it’s fine despite being the same thing as always first attack conceptually, which was removed?) or something that may arise in the future.

1 Like