Just don’t take keystones…and veteran is the most versatile skill tree
Also, let’s say it… Ogryn is the most easy class ever… you have too many ways to recover toughness… at contrary of the zealot (that is still a strong class).
And I am sad that the community pushed for… that. Keystones are badddddddd…
You don’t know how to edit a post to avoid 3 consecutives posts… maybe you should avoid such comments?
Yeah, I’ve noticed that (for example) Psyker Keystones are unusually easy to get to in comparison to Zealot Keystones and so forth, so I think I understand what you’re saying is an issue for the Veteran.
Sounds like you just want better match making? Nerfing the class itself isn’t relevant? There’s more veterans than any other class. But I agree it’s better when it prioritizes different classes vs homogenized strike teams. I think Fatshark said in patch notes they did add logic for this.
With loadouts you can at least have different psyker builds ready to go based on what other psykers are there. Maybe do gun psyker if everyone has a staff.
I would REALLY like the ability to swap classes though. 3 psykers? Nah, I am going Ogyrn now.
Also, veteran is THE most picked class by a wide margin FYI. Fatshark released stats on it.
as my boy said Ogryn is strongest (as it should be.. but), when i play with psykers i dont feel like my win ratio increases by any stretch of imagination
vet and psyker are just the most fun classes to play, at least for me, but the moment things go wrong they get obliterated, its just the way it is
actually you should ask fatshark to buff them, not their damage but their survivability, zealots and ogryns are just too many leagues ahead in that department
I remember someone saying that the matchmaker stacking a load of the same type of player, cynically, was so that you could see other people’s camo / outfits.
And therefore try to tempt you to buy them/something from the shop.
Zealot is the strongest but has the highest skill cieling with a pretty low skill floor. He’s not inherently going to be the most killy on the field for various reasons unless you’ve got a cracked out crit build going. Which is really just the problem with crit builds in the first place.
Excuse me… but I laughed a lot while reading your post. If they made this, they are seriously dumb…
Better to give us true tools linked to cosmetics so weapon customization (even only visual) and possibility to recolor the models they sell. Also, they should sell cosmetics at a correct price… I don’t like that they ask a kidney for just a cosmetic pack.
Let’s say it… they did all wrong. And still I wanted to support them. But, everything has an end… and unless they correct their behavior, I guess that they will loose little by little customers.
Let’s be honest, what they sell is not worth the price. We cannot even recolor it and the prices are outrageous.
I’m not saying I think Fatshark did this, but you remember Activision patenting their premium cosmetic matchmaking system for Call of Duty? It matched you with players who were better than you at the game and had premium cosmetics, because their analysts stated that if you saw someone playing well at the same class as you, you’d be more likely to make the purchase.
Its easy to find online if you’re curious.
Again, not saying this is what Fatshark do at all, but it there are some scummy companies that do.
so just so we understand, dont Nerf them because they are too strong or they are imbalanced.
Nerf then because they are popular and you dont like how popular they are?
how about no, Fatshark should look to making the other options better.
BETTER not necessarily stronger, better could mean cooler cosmetics or more interesting interactions.
but please dont advocate for Nerfing something because its popular and you dont like it.