Accessory entry error,+5-20% Damage Resistance (grenadiers)

Warhammer 40,000: Darktide Bugs
1

Accessory entry error,+5-20% Damage Resistance (grenadiers)

image
image459×115 53.9 KB

Although effective against melee damage to flamethrowers and gas grenade throwers
But in the training ground, the damage resistance of toxic gases did not take effect

20%X3 Damage Resistance (grenadiers)——579→450=129
15%X3 Corruption Resistance——579→499=80
20%X3+15%X3——579→499=80
Not carrying these two entries——579→450=129

image
image442×457 96.7 KB

Of course, it actually takes effect in the online game instance

image
image440×245 46.4 KB

————————————————————————————————————————
Besides, I can understand that the corrosion caused by toxic gas is ineffective against the enemy
But why can’t the flame ground have an effect on flame grenade throwers?

image
image1086×547 70.9 KB

2

I had the same issue once with Bomber Resistance acting funny in the training ground. A game restart fixed that, the curio stat works as intended in there, too (just tested it again).

1 Like
3

This resist is not for the “bombers”
It is for poxbursters

4

This is wrong. The Bomber Resistance curio stat has been changed (a while ago) to affect either Bomber, it does nothing against Poxbursters.

1 Like
5

Not sure

From gadget_traits_common.lua

gadget_traits_common.gadget_damage_reduction_vs_bombers = {
	buffs = {
		gadget_damage_reduction_vs_bombers = {
			{
				stat_buffs = {
					[stat_buffs.damage_taken_by_chaos_poxwalker_bomber_multiplier] = 0.95,
				},
			},
			{
				stat_buffs = {
					[stat_buffs.damage_taken_by_chaos_poxwalker_bomber_multiplier] = 0.9,
				},
			},
			{
				stat_buffs = {
					[stat_buffs.damage_taken_by_chaos_poxwalker_bomber_multiplier] = 0.85,
				},
			},
			{
				stat_buffs = {
					[stat_buffs.damage_taken_by_chaos_poxwalker_bomber_multiplier] = 0.8,
				},
			},
		},
	},
}

But I would really love to see bomber resist have an effect on bombers enemies.

6

My mistake, the English for this entry should be ‘grenadiers’ instead of’ bombers ’
My English level is not very good, so I used machine translation

7

This resist is toward poxburster (the enemy that wants to explode on you) and not for scab bomber or dreg bomber (pox bomber).

The name is clearly confusing and I have seen this information just cause I was lucky. The name should be, at least, corrected.

And to be honest, pox bomber is my 2nd most hated enemy cause, even with 3 x 15% corruption resist, the corruption gas is hurting me too much (first is trapper and the nets that can go through walls or 12 736 enemies).

8

I’m quite sure from previous discussions and a patch note, that the trinket applies resistence to the bombers and not the bursters.
The problem should be down to fatshark using weird internal names.

9

chaos_poxwalker_bomber is poxburster. I am sure of this.

as an example in minion_target_selection.lua you can find that:

minion_target_selection_weights.cultist_grenadier = {
	disabled = -8,
	distance_to_target = 2,
	max_distance = 50,
	occupied_slots = -0.1,
}
minion_target_selection_weights.renegade_grenadier = {
	disabled = -8,
	distance_to_target = 2,
	max_distance = 50,
	occupied_slots = -0.1,
}

cultist_grenadier is the dreg bomber (tox bomber) and renegade_grenadier is the scab bomber.

But do a search and find me the information… cause then, there is a bug in the darktide files. Cause actually, in the code, bomber resistance has no effect on “bombers”.
I repeat it… I would really be pleased that this resist would work against bombers…
Or I really would like that they add a resist to bombers. Tbh flamer resist would have made sense as a flame resist, but then this resist would be the most interesting.

1 Like
10


2 years and this whole time i thought “bombers” referred to “grenadiers”…
Which is why i never used it.

1 Like
11

This is the old template, not in use. In the same file, you’d find the other one.

Instead of repeatedly spreading outdated information, you could have done a quick test to check what happens if you have the curio stat equipped. The results are obvious.

And I struggle to follow how code bits of enemy targeting are supposed to help your argument.

2 Likes
12

As I said… that’s a great news.
And you’re right… I tested.

And I had no intention to spread false information… I ve just did not see that part of code.

Proof:

And

So, I am glad it works like this.

13

55c3b6a74a4e56a959a5f6a0e10ef690
55c3b6a74a4e56a959a5f6a0e10ef690802×741 33.5 KB

1 Like
14

After testing, it did work on the melee attack and ground flame of the grenadier, also effective against toxic grenadiers,not the poxburster.
I repeat, not poxburster